Words and pictures from the author of And the Crows Took Their Eyes as well as the Elizabeth Goodweather Appalachian Mysteries . . .
Thursday, December 15, 2022
Wednesday, December 14, 2022
A Capture
This photo--taken through a not-very-clean windshield makes me unreasonably happy.
I pass this particular spot every time I go to pick up Josie or into Marshall or beyond. For years I've noticed what a lovely scene it is and wished there were a place to pull over and take a picture. But there isn't. And it's just after a blind curve. And the road is such that the idea of parking farther away and walking to get the picture I want inevitably makes me think of a headline: WANDERING ELDERLY WOMAN STRUCK AND KILLED ON COUNTY ROAD.
But a few days ago, I'd been paying attention and was reasonably sure there were no cars behind me, so I stopped and grabbed this shot through the windshield.
I don't know why I find this so appealing. Maybe it's the ways the trees lean over the water. And the white of the water beating on the rocks. And the indistinct barns in the distance. The red-brown leaves on the right.
It's always beautiful to me. Now I'll have to capture it in the snow. And the spring, summer, and fall.
Carefully, of course.
Tuesday, December 13, 2022
And There was Sunshine
Monday, December 12, 2022
Sunday, December 11, 2022
Caring
Saturday, December 10, 2022
Unseasonal Sad Surprise
Friday, December 9, 2022
Thursday, December 8, 2022
Pasta Bob
Wednesday, December 7, 2022
Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!
Tuesday, December 6, 2022
Josie Back at the Library
Monday, December 5, 2022
Never Let Me Go
I am seriously late to this fine and disturbing book, published in 2005, just when I was writing under deadline and not reading anything new.
I haven't seen the film, but I'd heard enough to have some idea of what the book was about. It was the Audible edition that I listened to (an excellent narrator) and I can highly recommend it.
Dystopian fiction at its best. Like the scenario I envisioned a few days ago with Universal Auto-Correct, the premise in both cases is bizarre and far-fetched, but the idea at the core invites the reader to look around them for similar situations.
I can't say it better than these paragraphs from a review in The Guardian (full review HERE):
"Perhaps the most sinister aspect of the novel is the way it reflects ourselves back at us. In this world, the cost of a world free from cancer and diseases is, in human terms, catastrophic, but, as one character asks, how can we go back to a world where these diseases cause so much suffering and indignity? In the same way, our trade off for the luxury of development and the necessity of ending poverty seems to be locking us into a cycle of dependency on fossil fuels. Let alone the thought of where our cheap clothes, technology – and the raw materials which build them – come from. I’ve never quite encountered such a well-written fictional account of cognitive bias – the way we modify our beliefs or our behaviour to avert the guilt or discomfort at holding two self-contradictory beliefs in our mind at once – at society’s level. This alone makes this a precious book indeed. The spike in anti-migrant and anti-Muslim hate crime in a post-Brexit Britain, not to mention the rise of Donald Trump in the US or the far right in Europe, has been a salutary reminder of the need to always avoid ‘othering’ human beings; this book is full of such compassion for humanity it must surely be a worthy antidote. The idea of letting the technological or medical genie out of the bottle without considering the full moral, social and environmental implications is as relevant and haunting today as it has ever been."
Sunday, December 4, 2022
Let There Be Lights!
And the lights! Yesterday was so dark and gloomy that the lights were a wonderful addition. Slowly we are inching toward full Christmas glory--John plans to get a tree on Saturday and Justin, Claui, and Josie will help us decorate it on Sunday.
Saturday, December 3, 2022
Univeral Auto-Correct
Once the entire populace had been chipped, installing UAC
(Universal AutoCorrect) was possible. Of course, there were fierce debates—the
utility of social lying (Oh, no, it’s delicious--I’m just not very hungry
or Of course you look good in yoga pants) as a lubricant for
interactions was so obvious—but the damage done by the larger lies (I was working
late; I never saw that man before; they invaded us; I won the election;
what climate change?) was impossible to overlook.
It was so simple. If one spoke an untruth--whether knowingly or from ignorance, the chip would override the original statement and the speaker would hear themself saying, "No, that's wrong. Actually . . ." and going on to correct the statement.
Quis ipsos custodies custodiet? you
ask. The custodians were carefully programed bots—of course, it was humans who
did the programming, to begin with, but once the parameters of Truth had been
laid down, the bots were perfectly capable of amazing feats of extrapolation.
As a safety measure, a quarterly review was instituted—on the
ninth day of January, April, July, and October, UAC would be disabled for 24
hours, during which time a re-assessment of its reliability and its social
utility would be performed. For the first years, this review was carried out by
social scientists, religious leaders, and politicians, but when a series of
particularly horrendous accidents removed a number of the review panelists, the
few that remained withdrew, leaving the work of assessment to the bots.
Life with UAC has run smoothly ever since the bots enabled the
chips with a shock feature. The general population has learned to think
carefully before speaking or, indeed, before asking difficult questions. Political
rallies have ceased altogether, ever since the debacle which saw a certain carefully
arranged blond comb-over stand on end and finally, as the mouth under the
comb-over continued to speak untruths, despite the increasing strength of the warning
shocks, the comb-over, now rippling like prairie grass, caught fire.
UAC was an especially difficult challenge for the legal
profession. Courts were still needed to assign punishment for confessed crimes. But many once prosperous lawyers simply
resigned rather than work under the constraints of UAC. Some went mad first.
Particularly interesting was the phenomenon of people waiting till the quarterly review days to propose marriage or to enter into business arrangement . . .
I have no idea where this is going or if there will be more. It's an intriguing thought, though.









































