Showing posts with label language. Show all posts
Showing posts with label language. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Our Changing Language


In the critique workshop I'm leading, I edit about sixty pages each week so my inner English teacher is on high alert these days.  I had to shake my head when I recently saw someone on social media talk about a segway from one topic to another. I'm pretty sure the person wasn't talking about riding one of those funny two-wheeled people movers but just didn't know how to spell segue  -- which is, indeed, pronounced seg way and means a smooth transition from one thing to another. And was likely the reason for the name of the people movers.


In the course of my editing, I recently encountered a sentence like this: Hopefully, it won't rain. In my mind this is incorrect. What does that adverb hopefully modify anyway? A better sentence would be I hope it won't rain. But the first sentence and its ilk are common usage -- so I checked with several grammar sites, most of which simply throw up their (figurative) hands and say, yes, that usage of hopefully is technically incorrect but it's now acceptable since  everyone uses it. 



Okay, then. I'll let it slide. But what about the person who refers to the glass in a window being decimated?  As a one-time Latin student, I seem to recall decimated originally meant killing one in ten as a punishment for a group -- a nasty practice the Romans employed to ensure discipline -- and the word came to mean destroying a portion of something.  Can one decimate a window, I wondered.

Yep. The one in ten is the quaint historical definition, Now decimate means destroying a large portion or entirely. 

Hmm -- glad I checked. It seems I'm aging out of the grammar and usage game -- stuck back in ancient Rome.

Who knows -- maybe before long segway with a lower-case S will replace segue.

But they will have to pry the Oxford comma from my cold, dead hands.



Monday, October 12, 2009

Outside the Box . .


. . . and other annoying expressions.


At lunch in Cedar Mountain last week, the talk turned to annoying expressions and someone mentioned "thinking outside the box" as a phrase she was tired of hearing. Someone else mentioned "Whatever" and I think "at the end of the day" and "at this point in time" were others.

I'm not crazy about "Whatever" as a response (though I'm sure I'm guilty of using it.) Turns out I'm not alone. The email newsletter World Wide Words mentions it as the single most annoying phrase according to a survey of Americans.

Of course, these annoying little catch phrases are infinitely useful to a writer. They're a way of making a character's voice unique -- just as my editor suggested having Sallie Kate, Elizabeth's realtor friend call people "Honey."

"You know" is another odd conversational tic that a lot of folks drop in every few words, as if trying to make sure you're listening. Or "You know what I'm sayin'?"

"Awesome," I've noticed, is a kind of all purpose positive response for all kinds of things, as in:
"I mailed that letter for you, Ashley."
"Awesome."





Kind of takes the oomph out of what used to be a powerful word. Awesome should have been left for the Grand Canyon, the ocean, a volcano's eruption, God's hand reaching down from the clouds . . .











Just like "wonderful" -- are all those things I've called "wonderful" really full of wonder?

Oh, well, nothing worse than an old English teacher /curmudgeon.

Or, as some might say, "Whatever floats your boat."








Posted by Picasa

The Internet Radio interview I did Friday is available for listening here. My goodness, I say umm a lot.